The White House requested a $1.5 trillion defense budget for fiscal 2027, about $441 billion more than fiscal 2026, according to an immixGroup analysis published by Washington Technology. The proposal still requires congressional approval, but several of its largest technology allocations support systems people operate directly, including autonomy, command and control, and missile defense.

These systems depend on interfaces that crews can interpret quickly and accurately. Many defense contractors don’t maintain enough in-house product design capacity to support every program, so they turn to outside providers. Buyers may then have only one call to determine whether a studio has designed for defense operators before.

This guide compares top providers of military and defense UI/UX design services with publicly documented defense or government work. It explains what these services include, examines the fiscal 2027 budget areas driving demand, provides a partner selection checklist, and answers common buyer questions.

Companies at a glance:

  • Cosmos Studio: GEOINT, ISR, and counter-UAS interfaces with in-house front-end engineering
  • Great State: Design system and application for the Ministry of Defense MyDefence program
  • Kainos: Defense data platforms delivered through embedded teams
  • Creative Navy: HMI, embedded GUI, and defense operator interface design
  • 5IVE UX: Counter-drone and C2 product design
  • Truss: DoD and federal digital services with UX research embedded in delivery teams

What Does Defense UI/UX Design Include?

Defense UI/UX design covers user research, interaction design, visual design, and often front-end engineering for software operators and analysts use. The methods overlap with commercial UX, but defense products introduce several additional requirements:

  • Decisions under pressure: Operators may have only seconds to interpret information, making alert priority, visual hierarchy, and error prevention central to every screen.
  • Military symbology: Map-based products often use NATO standards such as MIL-STD-2525 and APP-6.
  • Roles and clearance levels: Permissions determine which information, controls, and export options each user can access.
  • Field conditions: Interfaces must account for low bandwidth, intermittent connectivity, offline operation, field hardware, and night use.

Where the Fiscal 2027 Defense Budget Points

The Fiscal 2027 defense request remains a proposal, and Congress hasn’t enacted it. However, its technology allocations indicate where the proposed funding is concentrated. Five areas directly affect interface design:

  • Autonomy: The request allocates $63 billion to autonomous and unmanned systems, including $54.6 billion through the Defense Autonomous Warfare Group, according to immixGroup’s fiscal 2027 budget analysis.
  • Command and control: C4I programs receive $29.5 billion in the request. JADC2 is the largest individual program at $2.1 billion, while the Army holds the largest service share at $5.4 billion, immixGroup reports.
  • Missile defense: Direct references to Golden Dome account for $17.5 billion in the request. The Missile Defense Agency represents $7.2 billion of that amount, according to the same immixGroup analysis.
  • Cyberspace: The request includes $20.5 billion for cyberspace activities, with $12.1 billion allocated to cybersecurity and $7.7 billion to cyberspace operations. These totals come from line items immixGroup tracked across the military services.
  • IT baseline: An earlier immixGroup analysis placed the fiscal 2026 DoD IT request at $66 billion, an increase of $1.8 billion over fiscal 2025. Proposed Army AI spending rose by $507 million, or 38.3%.

Firms Delivering Military and Defense UI/UX Design Services

Defense UI/UX providers include product studios, government digital agencies, and engineering consultancies. This review identified firms with publicly documented defense or government projects. The table below compares their areas of expertise, delivery models, and entry budgets.

Company Defense specialty Flagship deliverable Team setup
Cosmos Studio GEOINT, ISR, counter-UAS, defense data platforms Browser-based geospatial analysis platform for Bravo1Alpha Senior-only team of 10 to 25 with in-house front-end engineers
Great State Personnel-facing defense apps and digital strategy MyDefence design system and app for the Ministry of Defense Strategy, experience design, and digital engineering disciplines
Kainos Defense data, cloud, and AI services Sovereign Enterprise Data Platform for the Ministry of Defense Deployed teams embedded across defense organizations
Creative Navy HMI, embedded GUIs, operator screens Mission interface modernization for defense operators Small, fully remote senior team
5IVE UX Counter-drone, C2, cybersecurity products Counter-drone and C2 project for D-FEND UX, UI, and engineering staff on shared projects
Truss DoD and federal digital services SITH insider threat platform for the DoD UX research and design inside each delivery team

1. Cosmos Studio

Cosmos Studio provides military and defense UI/UX design services guided by a data-honesty principle: the interface never presents unverified information as fact. Every displayed value identifies its source, coordinate precision reflects how the data was captured, and missing fields remain visibly empty. Classification markings also carry through to exported files.

This approach guides the geospatial platform Cosmos Studio built for Bravo1Alpha, where analysts work with electro-optical, multispectral, and SAR imagery in the browser.

Each engagement begins with mapping user roles and permission levels. The process then moves through information architecture, prototyping, UI design, and usability testing before the studio’s in-house React and TypeScript engineers build the production front end.

For products already in the field, the team can audit the existing UX and restructure workflows without disrupting core functions. A senior partner network supports backend development, mobile applications, and AWS infrastructure, allowing clients to work through one contract and one point of contact. Cosmos Studio has a 5.0 Clutch rating based on 20 reviews.

  • Published defense work: Geospatial analysis platform for Bravo1Alpha, ISR product website, and a brand system and multi-page product website for a defense hardware startup working under NDA.
  • Typical buyers: Defense startups, intelligence teams, and dual-use technology companies.

2. Great State

Great State created a design system for MyDefence, a Ministry of Defense application that provides personnel with a native-style mobile experience. User research, user-centered design, the MoD brand identity, and accessibility and security requirements informed the system. Stakeholders approved it as a foundation for future MoD digital products.

The agency’s second published defense case study, MyNavy, covers a next-generation digital experience for military personnel. Great State provides digital strategy, product innovation, experience design, and digital engineering. It lists Government and Defense as a core area of expertise alongside Higher Education and Automotive.

  • Published defense work includes the MyDefence application and design system, a people-centered digital strategy for the Ministry of Defense, and MyNavy.
  • Typical buyers: Government and defense organizations modernizing personnel-facing services.

3. Kainos

Kainos works with Defense Digital and the Ministry of Defense as the design authority and prime delivery partner for a Sovereign Enterprise Data Platform. The platform supports secure data analysis across accredited environments.

Its work covers discovery, service design, development, and rollout. Kainos also embeds deployed data teams within defense organizations to support implementation and ongoing delivery. Army modernization work extends the platform and its data capabilities into the land domain.

Kainos was selected as a Strategic Cloud Partner to Defense in 2025. The company holds ISO 27001 and Cyber Essentials Plus certifications and reports more than 30 years of technology delivery.

  • Published defense work: Sovereign Enterprise Data Platform, embedded deployed data teams, and Army modernization data programs.
  • Typical buyers: Defense ministries and military commands seeking data, cloud, and AI services.

4. Creative Navy

Creative Navy uses a hardware-first process for operator interfaces. Projects begin by defining how the system works, which states it can enter, and which technical limitations the hardware imposes.

BAE Systems appears on the studio’s technology client list alongside Infineon, Miele, and Philips. Creative Navy has also published a project on modernizing mission interfaces for defense operators.

The studio operates as a small, fully remote team of senior designers with backgrounds in cognitive science and engineering. Its wider portfolio includes a train management application, a Border Force application, a global UX program for PepsiCo, and a unified UX foundation for General Motors.

  • Published defense work: Mission interface modernization for defense operators, BAE Systems client work, and a Border Force application.
  • Typical buyers: Hardware, avionics, and defense electronics manufacturers.

5. 5IVE UX

5IVE UX focuses on defining complex products before moving into interface design, an approach reflected in its legal name, FIVE – Product Definition Ltd.

The studio categorizes its D-FEND portfolio under counter-drone systems, command and control, and operational software. Uvision, a defense and aerospace systems company, also appears on its client list.

Security software represents another part of the portfolio. Clients include Fortinet, Tenable, Verint, and Cisco, while published work for Rezilion covers cloud-security dashboards. 5IVE UX reports completing more than 1,000 projects for over 200 clients during more than 25 years of operation. Its core services include UX strategy, user research, and product design.

  • Published defense work: Counter-drone and C2 product work for D-FEND and client work for Uvision.
  • Typical buyers: Defense technology, cybersecurity, and enterprise software companies.

6. Truss

Truss’s federal technology work dates back to the HealthCare.gov recovery. The company announced its ISO 9001:2015 certification in November 2025. Government buyers can procure its services through GSA IT-70, SEWP VI, and the SBA 8(a) program.

Within defense, Truss built SITH, a platform supporting DoD insider-threat assessment and mitigation. The company reports that the platform entered production with real users in April 2024.

UX design and research specialists work within each delivery team alongside client staff. Truss has published case studies covering MilMove, the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency, the Department of Labor, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and the 2024 IRS Direct File pilot.

  • Published defense work: SITH insider-threat platform, MilMove, and the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency.
  • Typical buyers: Federal agencies, enterprises, and startups.

How to Choose a Military and Defense UI/UX Partner

You can complete these five checks in one afternoon before signing a contract:

  • Verify fielded work. Shortlist only firms that can show at least one defense or government interface used by real operators, even if they can only present it during a private call under NDA.
  • Confirm knowledge of relevant standards. Each candidate should identify the standards your interface requires, such as MIL-STD-2525, APP-6, or MIL-STD-1472, and explain how those standards affect its design decisions.
  • Define code and design-system ownership. The statement of work should specify who builds the front end and who owns the design system, component code, tokens, and source files after launch.
  • Set security requirements before work begins. Confirm the rules for file access, staff vetting, controlled environments, and any citizenship requirements.
  • Require human readiness evidence. Include research notes, usability test results, and design rationale as formal deliverables your program office can use during readiness reviews.

Conclusion

Defense budgets are funding more systems that people operate directly, from drone fleets to missile defense consoles. Each program adds interfaces that crews must interpret quickly. Poor interface design can lead to retraining, workarounds, and expensive rework after deployment.

Start by writing a one-page brief describing your operators, their working conditions, and their critical tasks. Choose the interface with the highest operational risk and send both items to two or three providers of military and defense UI/UX design services. Compare how each team reasons about the problem before comparing prices.

 

Bogdan Sandu
Share
Written by Bogdan Sandu

Bogdan Sandu is a seasoned designer who has been designing websites since 2008. Renowned for his expertise in logo design and visual branding, Bogdan has developed a multitude of logos for various clients. His skills extend to creating posters, vector illustrations, business cards, and brochures. Additionally, Bogdan's UI kits were featured on marketplaces like Visual Hierarchy and UI8. He also wrote in the past years on sites like Design Your Way, WebDesignerDepot, WPDean, Designmodo, Speckyboy, Slider Revolution, and more.